Amersi v Leslie: Defendants’ Skeleton Argument on Claimant’s application to amend and Defendants’ to strike out in relation to whether the Claimant has a viable case of serious harm to reputation and/or any legitimate vindicatory purpose is proportionate to the costs and court resources in litigating the claim.
George v Cannell: Appellants’/Defendants’ Application for Permission to Appeal in the Supreme Court on the correct interpretation of section 3(1) of the Defamation Act 1952 concerning the damage element of a malicious falsehood claim (permission granted on 21 December 2022).
George v Cannell: Respondents/Defendants’ Skeleton Argument in the Court of Appeal on the correct interpretation of section 3(1) of the Defamation Act 1952 concerning the damage element of a malicious falsehood claim.
Malkiewicz v The United Kingdom: Application to the European Court of Human Rights on behalf of Grzegorz Malkiewicz, Teresa Bazarnik-Malkiewicz and Czas Publishers Ltd claiming that the huge costs involved in defending English defamation claims amounts to a violation of the right to freedom of expression in Article 10 of the European Convention of Human Rights.
Depp v News Group Newspapers Ltd: Skeleton argument on behalf of Amber Heard in opposition to Johnny Depp’s third party disclosure application.
Serafin v Malkiewicz: Defendants’ Case to the Supreme Court including the correct interpretation of the public interest defence in section 4 of the Defamation Act 2013.
Sube v News Group Newspapers Ltd: Defendant’s Skeleton Argument for Trial on the principles governing harassment by publication in a newspaper.